Update on Student attitudes towards learning with technology study

21 02 2013

We have had a great response so far on our initial request for schools to participate. However, there is room for additional schools should you want to get in on this project. There have also been requests for permission to administer the survey to the middle school students. I have talked this over with our research team and they are onboard with this and we will make some slight adjustments to the instrument so that it can be administered to students from 5th grade to 12th. This is exciting as this will also allow us to see patterns that might emerge as students go through their academic career.

If you are interested in joining the study, simply respond to this email and I will be providing additional information on how to access and administer the assessment. Remember, YOUR school will have full access to YOUR school’s raw data and summary report as produced by Survey Monkey which will allow you to perform your own analysis as well as compare your school’s profile with the general findings from the study. Additionally, no school identifying information will be included in the published findings.

The final outcome of this study is to produce a paper to be submitted for publication in a peer reviewed journal in the education/edtech field. There will be four authors on this paper as this is part of a research tutorial with 3 three student researchers from Greenhill School. We are excited about the project and look forward to getting the surveys out to participating schools within the next couple of weeks.

You can learn more about the study at:
http://bigenhoc.wordpress.com/2013/02/14/join-our-study-student-attitudes-toward-learning-with-technology-salt/

We look forward to working and learning with you.

Chris Bigenho (Primary Investigator)
Arjun Gupta (Student Researcher)
Caroline Gold (Student Researcher)
Lindsay Rawitscher (Student Researcher)





Join our study: Student Attitudes toward Learning with Technology (SALT)

14 02 2013

I have been working with three of our Greenhill (Greenhill School) graduating seniors on a research tutorial exploring two diverse problems.

One of these problems explores the nature of student attitudes towards learning with technology (SALT). There are many forms of technology and ways to work with it in learning environments. However, what do we really know about student’s attitudes towards learning with technology? What are the differences in their mind between teachers who make use of technology and those who don’t? What about the forms of technology used in the learning environment? What do we know about the way they approach projects and problems that may utilize technology? How do they feel about using technology as a tool for learning?

We have just piloted our new instrument with Greenhill Upper School Students and are currently running through a series of focus groups as a final step before releasing the survey to a large number of schools. This means we are now looking for schools that might be interested in participating in this study. We hope you will consider joining us on this project.
What will you need to do if you are involved in the project?
1. The survey is designed for any school (Public or Independent) who have grades 9-12.

2. The survey takes approximately 15 minutes to complete and consists of several scales and question types.

3. You will need to share the school specific survey link with your students and encourage them to participate. The larger the number of students participating at each school, the better understanding we will have at both the school level and across the study.

4. For schools that participate, there will be two winners randomly drawn from the school’s students who participated. Each will receive a $20 gift card.

5. Schools that participate will receive a full set of THE SCHOOL’S raw data and their summary reports as exported from Survey Monkey. This will allow you to compare your school data with the final published report.

6. An administrator at the school (your designee) will complete a short school profile survey so that the school’s data may be placed in context as we collect data from schools across the United States.

IMPORTANT INFORMATION

1. We will be analyzing the data across all of the schools and plan to submit our findings for publication in a peer review journal with the students as co-authors. No school or student identification will be used in any publications or presentations. The only people who will have access to the complete data set will be the primary investigator Dr. Chris Bigenho and his three student researchers.

2. In order to participate in the study, I will need a simple email to bigenhoc@greenhill.org from the head of school stating that they would like the school to be involved in the study.

3. The school will receive a full set of their data and summary report as produced by Survey Monkey in exchange for participating. This data will be useful in comparing your school with the findings in the final report.

I am happy to answer any questions you may have about this study and can be reached at bigenhoc@greenhill.org as well as my office number at 972-628-5479. It is our hope that you will join us as we try to better understand the use of technology for learning by students. Please email your interest. We look forward to hearing from many of you soon.

Below you will find additional information that is presented to the participant explaining the study and seeking their acknowledgement and approval for participating in the study.

I am also providing a link to my portfolio and some of my prior studies and publications so that you may have a better understanding of who I am as you consider joining us in this study.

Portfolio: http://dlp4success.com/portfolios/chris/index.htm 

Publications: http://dlp4success.com/portfolios/chris/unt_portfoliopages/researchpublications.htm

DISCLOSURE AND CONSENT INFORMATION

Before agreeing to participate in this research study, it is important that you read and understand the following explanation of the purpose and benefits of the study and how it will be conducted.

TITLE OF STUDY: Exploration of Student Attitudes towards Learning with Technology

PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR: Chris Bigenho, PhD

CO-INVESTIGATORS: Arjun Gupta, Caroline Gold, and Lindsay Rawitscher

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: You are being asked to participate in a research study which is designed to help us gain a better understanding of high school student’s attitudes towards learning with technology. This study involves a series of questions related to user technology habits and attitudes related to their feelings and experience with technology in learning environments and their personal learning habits. Understanding these attitudes is important to understanding how we can effectively use these technologies for teaching and learning.
STUDY PROCEDURES: You will be asked to complete a short survey that collects basic demographic and technology use information. This is followed by a series of questions that look at attitudes and preferences related to specific areas of using technology for learning and in learning environments. At the end of the survey, you will also have an opportunity to supply additional thoughts related to how you answered questions. The entire survey should take you 10 to 15 minutes to complete.

FORESEEABLE RISKS: There are no foreseeable risks involved in the study.

BENEFITS TO PARTICIPANTS AND OTHERS: We expect the process of this project to produce results that will be useful to educators, instructional designers and instructional institutions as they consider new approaches to teaching and learning. The results may also be useful to others in the research field and add to the body of knowledge on this topic. Additionally, participants may gain a better understanding of their own preferences and attitudes as they address the survey questions.

COMPENSATION FOR PARTICIPANTS: As a token of appreciation for your participation in our study, you will be entered in a drawing for a $20 gift card with a limit of two winners per school. You will receive the announcement of the drawing results immediately after the surveys for your school are complete.

PROCEDURES FOR MAINTAINING CONFIDENTIALITY OF RESEARCH RECORDS: Any identifying information will be coded so that only the principal investigator (Dr. Chris Bigenho) and the three co-researchers will have access to the un-coded data. Final reports and publications will involve only coded information, aggregate data and data analysis. The original data and research records will be locked in cabinets for three years. There will be no disclosure of data outside of the four researchers. The confidentiality of your individual information and the school information will be maintained in any publications or presentations regarding this study. Your acknowledgement of this statement and electronic consent will be maintained in separate locations than the collected data prior to any data analysis and data storage.

QUESTIONS ABOUT THE STUDY: If you have any questions about the study, you may contact Dr. Chris Bigenho at telephone number 972-628-5479 or e-mail at bigenhoc@greenhill.org.

RESEARCH PARTICIPANTS RIGHTS: Your signature below (electronic entry of first and last name) indicates that you have read or have had read to you all of the above and that you confirm all of the following:

1. Dr. Chris Bigenho has explained the study to you and answered all of your questions. You have been told the possible benefits and potential risks and or discomforts of the study.
2. You understand that you do not have to take part in this study and your refusal to participate or your decision to withdraw will involve no penalty or loss of rights or benefits. The study personnel may choose to stop your participation at any time.
3. You understand why the study is being conducted.





Sites of the Week- Election Week 2012

6 11 2012

Tracking Election Results
Electoral-Vote
http://electoral-vote.com/

Interactive polling site where you can play with maps, graphs, polls and election returns as a way of exploring different paths to the White House.

USA Today Electoral Vote Tracker
http://www.usatoday.com/interactives/news/politics/electoral-vote-tracker/

Play with the interactive maps for this year’s election as well as elections dating back to 1960. How has the Nation changed over time? What are the issues the shaped this change? How do these patterns reflect the changing economy, domestic and foreign policies, and demographic trends in the Nation?

New York Times- Electoral Map: Building a Path to Victory
http://elections.nytimes.com/2012/electoral-map

Another approach to visualizing the expected distribution of electoral votes. This site is interactive allowing you to make comparisons.

Balance of Power
http://visualizing.org/full-screen/42994

The site Visualizing.org had a contest inviting people to develop different ways to visualize the election. The winner is a visualization called the Balance of Power. You can see and explore this winning entry and read about the data that was used to create this dynamic graphic. It is best viewed full screen.

Political Engagement Map- Explore engagement with candidates’ Tweets
http://blog.twitter.com/2012/11/visualizing-2012-election.html

You have heard the pollsters and pundits. How does this compare with the conversation that is taking place in social media sites such as Twitter? Check out the Political Engagement Map where levels of engagement with candidates tweets is visualized on a map. This site is dynamic as the tweets are still flying. Check this out and see how it changes over time. This link takes you to the dynamic map as well as an explanation on how it works.

The Economist: Daily Graphics
http://www.economist.com/blogs/graphicdetail

Each day, The Economist provided a different graphic to visualize aspects of the 2012 election. This is a great collection and is well worth exploring. You can also view a 90 second video that takes you on a wild ride of rising and falling expected electoral votes as they changed daily over the year. Can you find the time when “You didn’t build that” and the 47% entered the narrative? This truly looks like a horse race.

Note: Sites of the Week is a service that I provide for the Greenhill Learning Community as part of an ongoing professional development and learning effort. It is shared here as a way to provide these collections to a larger community. Feel free to add to the community through the comment feature of this blog.





Blogging to “Learn How To Learn”- Join us!

2 03 2012

Friday 11:30-12:30

Room 4C-4

Exploring the world of metacognitive blogging or Thinking About Thinking as a way for students to discover their own learning process. This iterative approach to reflection is a powerful way to help students improve their understanding of how they learn. Analyze the science behind metacognition and how it can be used in your school through reflective blogging. Plus, we’ll cover recent research findings and specific examples from K-12 and beyond.

This session is interactive and personal as you journey into the world of Blogging to Learn How to Learn. The session will provide a basic background to metacognition and the importance of reflection as a unifying process of self-regulation for learning. You will also be asked to join in several experiences in which you will learn new things about your self through the process of iterative reflection. So, please join me today at the NAIS Annual Conference in Room 4C-4 from 11:30 to 12:30.





Opening Session at NAIS AC 2012 with Bill Gates

1 03 2012

The session opened with a wonderful performance by the Northwest School a cappella choir. The song of peace was a wonderful way to open the 2012 NAIS Annual Conference in Seattle. The voices of the youth expressing their dream for a day when there would be no war.

This was followed by a high energy song featuring duets accompanied by the group-“Singing Soul to soul, brother to brother, that a cappella sounds good to me…” Rousing applause and a standing ovation followed. What a wonderful group of kids demonstrating the power of message wrapped in song.

During transition, a wonderful media production illustrating the tenets of the theme INNOVATION: Imagine, Invent, Inspire, Dream. I am reminded by the first part of the presentation about a wonderful book I read recently that has a lot to say about innovation. Check out Six Great Scientists by Crowther. This book chronicles the path of innovation of six scientists from several centuries: The life and innovation of Copernicus, Galileo, Newton, Darwin, Curie and Einstein.

Pat Bassett takes the stage with thank you announcements out to all involved in this year’s conference followed by an interesting logo by the “Department of Innovation” Do you see anything wrong with this logo?

Yes, the cogs are locked. Schools locked in the past would be like this logo, an impossible situation that locks out innovation.

Pat challenges us by sharing an image of school in 1088 AD. What does your school look like? How different is your school from this image? What can you do to transform your school? Pat shared several images of school architects as innovators with net zero use of water and energy, living walls and a cool river through the building as a way of connecting the outside with the inside. This is an indication of the importance of place and space as an agent in learning

Pat also shared how a teacher took a few items and some free software to design and build what is now called the Cushings iClass Table.

Video of Cushing’s iClass Table

10 Promising innovations for education

  1. Adopting backward design and mapping curriculum around skills rather than subjects- the 6 Cs: Character, critical thinking collaboration, communication, creativity and cosmopolitanism/ cross cultural competency.
  2. Documenting student outcomes via formative assessment and demonstrations of learning- Capture in ps-12 schools over 13 years via digital portfolios
  3. Connecting appreciative inquiry, the strengths approach and growth mindsets- All subsets of the positivist psychology movement.
  4. Globalizing independent schools
  5. Stage II greening of independent schools
  6. STEM and beyond signature programming- robotics, Rube Goldberg and inventors competitions etc
  7. Professionalizing the profession- rotating schedules to free groups of faculty researchers, online PLS
  8. Public purpose of private education initiatives
  9. Online learning consortia for independent school branded courses
  10. Design Thinking- Incorporating MIT and Stanford Design Lab ideas

Pat Bassett quoting Bill Gates…

“Innovation is the means and equity is the end goal” from the 2012 Annual Letter Gates

Bill Gates was introduced by Bernie Noe as he related stories of the time when Bill was at Lakeside School in Seattle, his early days at Microsoft and his transition to philanthropy to save lives by focusing on what they could do to help those most affected by rotavirus. A focus on how to make the lives better for those who have the odds stacked against them…And now Bill Gates

Bill presented a talk on Fulfilling Technology’s promise to education: How much can technology help us teach and learn.

Bill opened with the wonderful NAIS education he received at Lakeside and how it was the only diploma he really needed- lots of laughter here as he shared a picture of his high school graduation. This is the only time Bill graduated. As Bill and Melinda focused on where to take their foundation, they wanted to help other students have a quality education as well. Bill took us back to his past education, colored chalk and a traditional approach. Now move to today, the formal approach to teaching has not changed much. Bill feels that technology will be a large player in this transformation.

What is a good learning environment? Bill offers One to One as one great option. Think of Yoda and Luke. Luke looks bored, Yoda changes his approach, changes challenge. But since we can’t all have lessons with Yoda, what role can technology play in bringing in a Yoda-ish approach to today’s classrooms? What if you could have a wealth of concepts available as you teach providing elements of student choice as they approach their learning, providing choices that teachers can use to match the students needs?

Bill sees a lot of promise in the use of technology for providing opportunities. He shared a simple graph of the trend of online learning in the US for K-12 students from 2000 to 2009.

How does online compare to face-to-face learning? However, this is not definitive as you must account for teaching styles, methods and the way the courses are constructed. Bill also shared a graph of growth in online learning as indicated by increased investment. From the survey about Online courses conducted by NAIS, the bulk of online courses were developed at the teacher level and then by the director of technology. Now consider the background of your technology director. This is an indication that our technology directors must now have expertise in pedagogical approaches to teaching and learning in complex connected environments.

Four areas of focus for technology in education

  1. Re-imagining textbooks- Textbooks must change to become interactive. Gone will be the days of static texts that we carry in heavy backpacks
  2. Scaling our best teachers through materials provided by experts
  3. Connecting through social networks- connecting students to students, teachers to teachers and learners to experts through various social media
  4. Personalizing learning- This is a place where the a system indicates new paths for an indiviaul student to take based on

The following sites were mentioned in a video shared by Bill. Each of these can be mapped back to one of the four aspect shared on the shifts stemming from increased use of technology in education.

Another advantage with technology is that it can also help increase the amount of time a student spends on manipulating content.

What about online schools? There was a callout to the Global Online Academy- 16 schools teaching 19 courses across the country. The courses are taught on Haiku and include a variety of topics including a course on 911.

So, with all that is available today, what is holding schools back? Not every student has access to the technology and not every student has Internet access when they get home. We need a format for reading online that is easy and accessible. We need to give teachers time to catch up and learn what other teachers are doing. We need to do comparison studies to make sure that we don’t increase the divide between students who do well and those who struggle. Additionally, The CORE Curriculum is trying to map standards based on the core curriculum. Looking ahead to the future 10 years. This is really a very short amount of time. Independent schools have a unique role to play in this by the nature of our independence. So how do we build the school of the future?

Bill Gates will now take your questions

What skills do you feel our students will need entering the job sector today?

While you can go online today to get information, not all of it is good information. Students need to be able to use new techniques to get information but also to determine the quality of the information. During school, you are used to being confused but many adults are stuck in a mode of “I know what I know” and never get around to learning what they didn’t get when they were in school. Now you can go online and fill in some of these gaps.

What are the implications of your vision of technology for education on band-width?
This is significant. You will need more bandwidth. The good news is that this is really a low cost of your overall technology budget. This however is related to location to urban areas.

How do you get parents and teachers on-board with new ways of working?
This is a big challenge as there are so many constituencies. Example: Parents know how they were taught the subject and this becomes a challenge as they generally don’t have any experience in learning in this new way. They know what worked for them. The process will likely be two steps forward and one step backward: A) Plan ahead, B) Give teachers who are open to the change full opportunity to move ahead. The students will follow along. There is a lot of resistance to change. Education has been done the same way for a long time. You need to pick your early adopters and work with them. This will help bring others along.

What can educators do to bring about a shift in publishing from paper to electronic?
There are many classes taught without a textbook. However, we need hard data on this. Open CK12 has some good books but you have to make sure you students have the device. Devices break and that is another factor that must be considered. You won’t save that much money with the new online texts as there will be new costs.

What is the value of the human connection in a technology infused education?
Personal interaction is very important and there are many aspects that can’t be replaced. However, technology is getting better. Bill tells how he now usually meets his daughter’s boyfriends online as they Skype and in fact, the parents are now meeting each other online before they meet face to face.





LIVE BLOG of the ISAS Teacher Conference #isastc

31 01 2012

Every two years, the Independent School Association of the Southwest holds their Biannual Teacher Conference. This is a rich experience of listening to challenging speakers present some of the latest in the field of education. This year’s lineup is sure to challenge the thinking of all who participate. I am fortunate enough to be able to attend this year in Houston and will be Live Blogging the six speaking sessions. It is my hope that you might consider joining along on this journey as you have the time.

It is easy to follow along from a distance. You simply follow the links I have provided here for the session you are interested in and set up a reminder for that session. You can then join when the session starts. While you will not be able to hear the audio from the session, I will be reporting live from the session. You will be able to join the conversation with all who might be following from a distance through the chat tool. My task is to accurately represent what is going on in the session so that those who follow from a distance can also benefit and engage in the conversation. If you are in the session and are tweeting, use the #isastc hash tag and so your tweets will be easy for others to follow. This will also allow these tweets to enter the session stream for the live blog.

Below is the schedule with links to each LIVE BLOG launch page

Thursday, February 2, 2012

12:45p- 2:15p
Pat Bassett (Information on Speaker)
Difficult, Courageous and Fierce Conversations
LIVE BLOG: http://bigenhoc.wordpress.com/2012/01/31/live-blog-difficult-courageous-and-fierce-conversations-pat-bassett/

2:30p-3:30p
Heidi Hayes Jacobs (Information on Speaker)
Essential Curriculum NOW!
LIVE BLOG: http://bigenhoc.wordpress.com/2012/01/31/live-blog-essential-curriculum-now-heidi-hayes-jacobs/

3:45p-5:15p
Michael Horn (Information on Speaker)
Rethinking Student Motivation: Why Understanding the “Job” is Crucial for Improving Education
LIVE BLOG: http://bigenhoc.wordpress.com/2012/01/31/live-blog-rethinking-student-motivation-why-understanding-the-job-is-crucial-for-improving-education-michael-horn/

Friday, February 3, 2012

8:15a-9:15a
Tony Schwartz (Information on Speaker)
Be Excellent at Anything
LIVE BLOG: http://bigenhoc.wordpress.com/2012/01/31/live-blog-be-excellent-at-anything-tony-schwartz/

9:30a-10:45a
David Eagleman (Information on Speaker)
The Neuroscience of Teaching and Learning
LIVE BLOG: http://bigenhoc.wordpress.com/2012/01/31/live-blog-the-neuroscience-of-teaching-and-learning/

11:00a-12:00p
Jane McGongal (Information on Speaker)
Learning Is An Epic Win
LIVE BLOG: http://bigenhoc.wordpress.com/2012/01/31/learning-is-an-epic-win-mane-mcgonigal/





Learning Is An Epic Win- Jane McGonigal

31 01 2012

ISASTC Session Description

Why don’t our schools work more like an online game? In the best-designed
games, our engagement is perfectly optimized: we have important work to
do, we’re surrounded by potential collaborators, and we learn quickly and in
a low-risk environment. When we’re playing a good online game, we get
constant useful feedback, we turbo-charge the neurochemistry that makes
challenge fun, and we feel an insatiable curiosity about the world around us.
None of this is by accident. In fact, game developers have spent the past
three decades figuring out how to make us more optimistic and more likely
to collaborate, how to make problem-solving more fun and social, and how
to satisfy our hunger for meaning and success. All of these game-world
insights can be applied directly to transform the way we learn, solve
problems together, and develop twenty-first century skills – and in this talk,
Dr. McGonigal will show us how.

For access to Live Blog of this session- Click Here








Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 706 other followers